So last week my teen son mentioned that one of his last year's teachers had finally come back to school. So naturally I asked why she had been out. He said she had been beat up by a student. A female student had hit her several times in the face, got her down on the floor and started kicking her. The teacher had been out for about a week.
What has this got to do with my story? It shows the attitude of much of this generations lack of care for anything or anyone but themselves.
I suppose every generation is the worst in the previous generations eyes. And I suppose this has been so since the beginning of time. Sorry, don't really want to go back that far. My concern is that things of this nature seem be considered normal, even routine.
Ok, I'm going to say it. Back in my day, if I had even got close to an incident of violence involving anyone, especially a teacher, I would have gotten my butt kicked at home. NO! Worse than that. I'd a got a whoopin'!
There seems to be no shame for certain behavior. And there seems to be an effort on the school system's part to keep things like this a secret.
Even with my first son, things were not like this. Most kids still showed respect for adults and certain situations. In other words, I wasn't afraid to go to my first son's school and walk down the hall without an escort.
I have to say that I am a critic of this public school system and the school system in general. My dislike for this system and the way it is run contributed to the decision for us to home school for nine years. It was one of the hardest things I've ever done to allow my son now to return, at his request, to this school system which I truly hate.
While I believe with all my heart, teaching is a calling, a very noble proffession, it is also infested with teachers who do not teach.
It's not my intention to bash teachers. Even in this school system, there are some very good teachers. And how do I define a good teacher? As one that stands before her or his class and talks about the subject in a way that gets the student to think and get involved. So how do I define a teacher who doesn't teach? As one whose class instruction is handouts, with reading straight from the book, with playing video games instead of being involved in class time, one who won't take questions & belittles any who try to ask one.
As the saying goes, if the shoe fits... Why this even matters here is because even an unruly, rebellious, undisciplined child might reconize dedication and passion and care shown toward them. As on the other hand, that child might reconize having a teacher with less as a sign that they the student are seen as a hopeless case so may as well not bother.
And I understand, one huge complaint all teachers have is that they spend most of their class time discipling. Well if that's the case, all those college grads ought to be able to think of a better way. I've always thought that parent involvement would be a key factor in gaining better control of the classroom. But years ago I had an administrative position person actually say to me that some parents you wouldn't want around your child. Hello! Job Screening! It's like what all employers do.
Like it's been said a million times before, it all starts at home; teaching that is, whether good or bad. And to pharaphase the Bible, "Teach a child the way he should go and when he is old he will not depart from it". When a child is taught right from wrong, whether or not he chooses to do the right thing, the teaching doesn't leave his mind.